Solar Power isn't Feasible!

Solar Power isn't Feasible!
This cartoon was on the cover of the book "SolarGas" by David Hoye. It echoes the Sharp Solar slogan "Last time I checked nobody owned the sun!"

Saturday, May 10, 2008

Solar Powered Wristwatches and the Zeitgeist Conspiracy

Behold one of the most criminally negligent cartoons ever made:

(Yeah, yeah, I know, you may think the riot-inspiring Danish cartoons showing the Prophet with a bomb in his turban was the worst, oh my brothers -- but they didn't stop anybody from loving God or his messengers while this one has helped nudge us ever more dangerously toward climate catastrophe!)


This irresponsibly stupid cartoon, first published by Jim Unger in 1999, was used even more irresponsibly by Robert L. Sexton in the 2002 edition of his basic textbook "Exploring Microeconomics, 2nd edition".

The completely erroneous and highly prejudicial anti-solar technology cartoon was used by Sexton as the chief illustration for the claim that "someone can take out a patent on what ends up being a bad idea, leading to monopoly losses."

How many undergrads using Sexton's book and enamored with the dogma of poorly thought out economics courses, then snickered and guffawed when well meaning fellow students tried to engage in a serious debate about alternatives to life-threatening fossil and nuclear fuels? How many young entrepreneurs left college with a degree in economics and this flawed and divisive image burned into their subconscious, and turned away from solar energy believing it is "a bad idea" that can lead to economic "losses"?

This is how the Zeitgeist conspiracy works. And this is part of the mythology of the Zeitgeist that has marginalized solar power for the last century and photovoltaics for the last half century.

No doubt Robert L. Sexton would protest that he was not trying to use this cartoon to disparage solar energy. He probably found it when reading the Sunday Funny Papers and thought, "this would be a clever and fun way to get my students to enjoy my textbook." And Jim Unger, when he created this fallacious Herman cartoon, probably didn't give a thought to how it could be used to erode confidence in solar energy in general. He probably doesn't have secret ties to the Bush and Bin Laden families, and may even drive a hybrid car for all we know. There is no "nyeh eh eh... let's use our influence and power as economics professors and syndicated satirists to destroy the market for solar energy!"

But that is what it does. Any replication of a false meme displaces its true counterpart. Lies and truth are substitute, not complementary, goods (to use the economic jargon in Sexton's textbook) and when consumers "purchase" the idea that solar energy is inefficient and a "bad idea", as the cartoon makes it seem and as the sober text with its authoritative weight sets in stone, there is no room on the consumers mental shelf for the reality that solar energy is in fact a very efficient solution to the energy crisis.

Shame on Unger, and shame on Sexton for not thinking through the subtle consequences of their errors!

"How many guys d'you know with a solar-powered wristwatch"? this 1999 travesty asks rhetorically? Well take a look at the truth (courtesy of The Watchismotimes.com's "Top 10 Vintage Solar Powered Watches":

1968: The Synchronar, invented by Roger Riehl. Some claim that besides being solar powered, this was also the first digital watch ever!


1971: The beautiful Uranus, one of the earliest LED watches in existence, made to look like a classic sundial meets digital LED technology!


1976: The Citizen Crystron, the first solar powered analog wristwatch.




1976, The Bicentennial Year Sicura LCD, with the innovation of putting the tiny (yes, really really tiny, Mr. Unger and Mr. Sexton! Ahem!) solar panels on the side of the watch.

1978: The analog version of the Solar Sicura comes out, proving solar power can be as blue-blood Ivy League elegant as any piece of jewelry used to go along with power ties and business lunches (if only Herman had worn this one into his fictional 1999 business meeting!)


1980's: The Seiko Lorus LCD -- proving, like all its predecesors that solar powered watches were emphatically NOT big and bulky (something we've known since the early 1960s -- do your homework Jim Unger!) but could be cheap to buy too.




1990s: Junghans 'Mega Solar' a radio-controlled solar wristwatch synchronized with the Caesium Time Base at Germany's National Institute of Natural Engineering and Sciences.


Why am I so passionate about the history of solar powered watches (thanks, Watchismo Times!)? Because in 1979, a year after I got my YMCA and PADI scuba diving certificates, I wanted to buy a solar powered diving watch for 150 bucks that I found in the back of a Popular Science magazine. It looked a lot like the early Synchronar. It was supposed to be waterproof to depths beyond what I would ever go to, and I had visions of never needing to replace it or any batteries as I travelled from sunny country to sunny country to pursue my diving obsession. At the age of 16 I was convinced that a solar powered wristwatch was the safest, most reliable and most sensible wristwatch a diver could ever own.

But when I went to my local dive shop to inquire, the owner talked me out of it saying, "solar technology? Yeah, sounds great but its unreliable. Unproven technology, you know? I mean, when you are underwater there is no sun, and what about when it rains, and you are out of power? You depend on your dive watch for your life, buddy. Here, buy this new mechanical quartz crystal watch I got in the display case here with the rotating bezel for 150 bucks... much better than some earthy-crunchy solar thing... personally I think solar dive watches are a bad idea..."

Robert Sexton would be proud: "Someone can take out a patent on what the dive shop owner says is a bad idea, which would lead to his monopoly losses (since he had the only dive shop in the area and didn't distribute those watches)"

Ah, the lazy logic of the Zeitgeist Conspiracy! My local dive shop owner wasn't against solar energy per se, and he certainly didn't like the oil industry (because oil spills spoiled his dive tours and cost him money!). But he wasn't going to push for anything he didn't know much about, or take any risks, and all he had to go on was a picture I had in Popular Science vs. the watches he had in his inventory and wanted to sell.

Sorry folks, that's how economics works -- consumer confidence drives markets and consumer confidence is affected by the religious inculcations we receive in undergrad economics courses and from reading the Sunday Comics. Sadly it has all added up for nearly 50 years into a general reluctance to wholeheartedly adopt the most promising technology humanity has ever discovered -- the ability to turn simple, ubiquitous, safe, silent light into useful electricity. And now, with war in the Middle East, the threat of nuclear proliferation and global climate change, we are paying the price for lagging.

Wouldn't it be nice if we could turn back the clock, reset our solar powered wristwatches, and start all over? Perhaps now we still have time to create a new Geist for a new Zeit...

This silly little tongue-in-cheek video that Utility Consultant Frank DiMassa and I just made after visiting solar research and industry sites in Southern Spain, shows how even the most die-hard "status-quo-tician" cannot fail to be moved by the truth of solar technologies now appearing all over Europe. So throw out your obsolete and irresponsible economics textbooks and go see for yourself!


Friday, May 9, 2008

Entrepreneurship to Address Global Poverty: The Solar CITIES relationship approach

The first time I was in Cairo, in 1982 as a Harvard exchange student on a year-abroad, earning money by teaching English to the Poor with the American University in Cairo Department of Public Service, I spent my free time acting in plays on the AUC stage. Realizing that people use language not to pass exams but to express themselves in real and emotionally important contexts and situations, I threw out the textbooks and brought the theater play scripts I was memorizing into the classroom instead. Then I had the students bring in costumes and props and we learned English by role-playing. During the sessions I would give them free tickets to the theater (none had ever been in the distinguished AUC theater, which the poor almost never get to see) and they would reinforce their aural skills in an event atmosphere by watching us perform the plays they had memorized and acted out in class.

In one of the plays, Brendan Behan's "Juno and the Paycock" I played an old man, mired in poverty, named Joxer Daly. I had one line in the play that resonated with my indigent students and that has informed my work to this day. Joxer says to the rich man who judges him, "If ye want to know me... come and live with me!"


On Wednesday, May 7th I had the good fortune to participate, via Video Skype from Germany, in fellow Harvard Krokadiloe alum Professor John Danner’s inaugural undergrad class on "Entrepreneurship To Address Global Poverty" at the Haas School of Business at UC Berkeley.
And when telling his students what I thought they should do to successfully address global poverty, I quoted Joxer Daly once again,

"If you want to know them (and help them), come and live with them!"

It was great to have this opportunity to e-connect (or is it AV-connect) with John Danner's students, and especially to connect over the idea of (to steal the phrase from the wonderful GlobalGiving.com organization) "unleashing the potential of people to make positive change happen" through intensely personalizing our discourse! The message: spend some time getting to know how "the other 90%" really live and think and feel. Then go about trying to make a difference.

I was afraid I hadn't quite been able to get across what I think is the most important lesson from my years working with "the poor", and that the students might have come away mighty confused from my long and meandering monologue about my experience as a “whiteface” circus clown meeting black gang kids in Oakland, on my history with using inner-city film-making to get at-risk youth involved with environmental issues in L.A.’s Crenshaw, Jefferson and Hollywood High Schools, on how we’ve used a capella and rock and roll musical goodwill tours of the Middle East and elsewhere in the world to promote renewable energy (sometimes on solar powered stages or with portable solar panels) and on how we go about the building of solar hot water and other renewable energy and urban ecology systems in slums with disadvantaged youth whom we first got to know during our concert tours.

In fact I was up all night trying to figure out how I could say things more succinctly and connect all these disparate experiences and insights together, hoping that eventually I can turn it all in the service of finding more effective ways to bring investment and education, and sustainable development, to areas where they are so badly needed.

I realized that the message I most wanted to share with the students, and hope they gleaned, or will glean, is that for sustainable development to succeed I think we need an intensely personal approach. There is rarely, if ever, a one size fits all solution for the problem of underdevelopment, as critics of Rostow's "Take-off to Sustainability" thesis have said for the past half century. My contribution to this would be to say "if we don't pull out all the stops, and connect in every way we can with our fellow humans, tapping into our shared enthusiasm for music, film, art, discovery and creation as a basis for relationship building, we won't be able to fulfill the technocratic functions that need to be worked out, or the implementation of nuts and bolts projects that need to be put in place and maintained because we will forever be isolated by a wall of mistrust, suspicion, envy, or prejudice (on both sides). And when the "experts" leave, the community we tried to “help” usually falls back into decay. We've seen it happen too often, haven't we?

I was trying to say to the students that we have to erase the barrier between "us" and "them" if we want to co-evolve successful programs, and we must build enduring personal relationships first (or concomitantly) where the joy of sharing our common enthusiasms as common people provides the backbone and skeleton upon which we then hang the sinews and muscles of development -- the infrastructure, the legal structures, the micro-credit programs, the business deals to help local entrepreneurship etc.

And that is where, I think, green-minded entrepreneurs can play the best role. I notice that when I was working with the Egyptian Wadi Foods Company for two years as we created the Wadi Environmental Science Center, the business deals that were made were always because the CEOs would meet somebody at a party or dinner or awards ceremony, or on the golf course or at a conference, and then establish a personal relationship and build trust. As a family business they would start making deals when they felt they could trust bringing people over to the house for dinner. That is how real business is done that lasts. But how many aid agencies or development agencies invite “the poor people” whom they are “trying to help” over for dinner?

The most successful B2B model, it seems to me, is always about trust and relationships, and I realized when I was reading Hernando DeSoto's "The Mystery of Capital" and the works of Mohammed Yunus that we need to apply that model to working with "the poor".

Which means students of business who want to make a difference need to get out into the communities they want to work with and get to know real people, making long-term investments in the human capital there. They have to establish friendships. And these must be real friendships, such as we have done in Cairo and Guatemala and Indonesia and Mexico and South Central Los Angeles, not the typically patronizing shallow socializing that goes on when a donor or funder or foreign visitor makes a scheduled tour to “inspect” the project.

I stressed to the students that they should take the time to really get to know just a few individuals who will become long-term friends, be it in Oakland, or South Central L.A., or skid row or Mumbai or Cairo. And once they know real individuals, and have built mutual trust, development becomes a simpler (if not simple) matter of sharing ideas and capital and vision with those individuals and maintaining the relationships as people with common interests always do.

Certainly in a time when we are globally connected via cheap mobile telephony, skype, email and blogs, there is no excuse to detach from your friends in the ghetto, even if you physical can’t get back there for a while.

Thus I stay in constant communication with Hanna Fathy and Mahmoud Dardir and our whole Solar CITIES project family in the slums of Cairo, and with our fellow stakeholders in Guatemala and inner city L.A. In a globally connected world we can truly live as Dr. Martin Luther King wanted us to, judging a man by the content of his mind rather than the color of his skin (or, more to the point for students who have overcome their racial prejudices but maintained their class privilege prejudices, the infrastructure of his community or the size and look of his home!)

So it stops being a question of "helping the poor" (which is derogatory and unsatisfying for those who "have-not" when it comes to fancy degrees or material goods or a high income) but a question of finding problem-solving partners who just happen to live in and among the greatest material and social challenges that one's solution set has to tackle.

In effect there can now be what my former advisor Dr. Susanna B. Hecht called "trading techne for metis" -- a fair trade where we offer our technical skills and our access to credit and investment capital for the profound and profoundly local knowledge and the in the field application opportunities that can only be found in areas with profound problems.

We turn the poor's problems, in effect, into their assets. We can trade with dignity with them in a win-win. After all, any business that can claim to, for example, solve the water problem in a poor community in Cairo, can use that to build credibility and reputation as a true solution-providing business and gain a leg over the competition.

After all, isn’t that what successful advertising is all about – convincing people your product (a solution to filling a need) is better than the competitors? The so called “have-nots” are the perfect advertisement for development products (products in food, energy, health care, comfort, waste management, water, safety – all the issues that consumers really spend most of their money on) and I argue that money is better spent finding a way to economically satisfy the needs and the consumer demand of the poor and letting word get around than putting money into posters and glossy magazine ads targeted at the wealthy. When the poor become “haves” (having your product and embracing its virtues) the people who have discretionary funds will know what to spend their money on, since most people are looking for the ideal compromise between price and performance. I think this is one of the points of the magnificent exhibit “design for the other 90%”.

So that is what I really wanted to get across to the Berkeley Business School students: build relationships first, on a human level, by any means necessary (a capella does work rather well, as villagers in South Africa showed me when they sang without instruments for us during our visit to present ideas on Eco-Villages during the Earth Summit in 2002) and then sit down and discuss partnerships for problem solving. It is much more direct than dumping money into some aid organization or some add campaign and hoping it trickles through the bureaucracy to the people.

My wife and I were just discussing Virginia Holman's article in "Spirit" magazine about "Person-to-person Philanthropy" and reflecting that this is the way we have always operated, but hadn't yet formalized in our young Solar CITIES Association (we recently legally registered in Germany as a "Verein", a type of NGO that facilitates our work in Egypt without getting mired in their bureaucracy).

We believe that person-to-person philanthropy holds a key to development. Our biggest caution in the implementation is how we all go about framing the philanthropy:

It must be seen as a two-way street.

The so-called “poor” are equally rich in heart, and should be considered partners in philanthropy, helping and giving as much to the “donor” as they get.

We don't use the binary optic of "rich" and "poor" when we do our work. We abhor such distinctions. To claim to "work with the poor" we feel, is to set up an arbitrary dualism that defeats real progress. What we do, and what we urge students to do, is to get to know our fellow human beings with whom we share the planet, get to know them as individuals and families, and get to know their communities, and then, when we see a need, or a challenge, or a problem to be solved, get together as fellow stakeholders and solve it.

As one inner city teacher trainer in the Los Angeles Unified School District Intern Program told me before I set foot in his community in South Central L.A. “you don’t come here to teach. You come here to co-learn.”

We often talked about Edward Said's insights into the damaging affects of "othering" and how this creates the conditions for the "orientalism" that has so affected the dignity of people in the Middle East (and elsewhere). Good business practice has always been built on personal Person to Person trust -- B2B is really about P2P and F2F interaction, I tell students. I urge them not to think about helping a "class" of people but really helping certain individuals whom they have established relationships with and then widen the circle.

In our particular case in Cairo, as in my work in the L.A. Ghettos, it started with visits to the homes of our friends Mustafa Hussein (a young carpenter), Hanna Fathy (a young garbage sorter) and Mahmoud Dardir (a young environmentalist teacher-in-training from a family that fled the slum of Darb Al Ahmar and now lives in the impoverished sprawl that has destroyed the precious agricultural land on the outskirts of Cairo). Seeing that Mustafa and Hanna usually didn't have any source of water, much less hot water, we began to brainstorm solutions to their individual problems, visiting each other's homes and taking trips to various institutions to meet engineering and environmental professors, like Dr. Jeff Miller, Dr. Moshira Hassan, Dr. Salah Arafa and Dr. Salah El Haggar at AUC, and urban planners, development workers, architects, inventors and environmental engineers like Seif Rashidi, Shareen Zaghow, Kareem Ibrahim and Naveen Akl, Magdy Zahran and Alaa Watidy. Ultimately we realized we could use their advice but to make things sustainable we would have to solve the local problems ourselves, at the local level, by pooling and applying the best advice and examples that experts like them could offer and that we could find through our virtual and physical travels but focusing on cooperative learning and capacity building. And that meant spending LOTS of time together, moving into the community and eating and celebrating events with the families.

My wife and I became the donors of the first three plumbing, water pumping, roof storage tank and solar hot water systems that were necessary, building everything from scratch and learning along the way. Then a couple of my American University in Cairo mentor professors, Dr. Miller and Dr. Hassan, came to visit us in the slums and got to know the guys and their families and then they donated some money and roof space at the university to continue experimenting. Then Gene Lin, a dear friend who I play in a rock and roll band in Cairo, who is an infrastructure engineer for US AID, and another dear friend, Bruce Abrams, a fellow UCLA Urban Planning graduate who works on democracy issues for US AID, came out to visit what we had achieved and Gene recommended that his colleague Susan Pollack, who was in charge of the small grants program visit too, and we were soon invited to submit a proposal. A year later we received the $25,000 small infrastructure grant from US AID that is funding Hanna and Mahmoud and Mustafa to train others and to build 30 to 50 hand-made solar hot water systems.

Most importantly for sustainability, Gene invited the youth from the Zabaleen Recycling school who perform theater plays about their history and play music concerts on garbage cans a la "Stomp" to come to his home to rehearse and jam, and then we all went out to the communities of Manshiyat Nasser and Darb Al Ahmar to perform concert festivals together in which we shared multi-cultural music, presentations on environmental projects and, most importantly, GOOD TIMES.

As they say, people sometimes remember what you said, often remember what you did, but ALWAYS remember how you made them FEEL.

Now, each time visitors come to their communities Hanna and Mahmoud take them on a tour of the project and invite them to "break bread" with them and get to know some families. Sometimes visitors actually make donations but we never solicit them, as we are respectful of people's feelings -- we think each person's spirit moves in its own subtle ways and needs no "hard sell".

One couple from Canada who were visiting the St. Samaan monastery came down to the informal school to see the projects and saw immediately with their own intuition that we could extend pipes from the solar hot water system we built on the recycling school into the shanty dwelling of a neighboring family who had no water and lived with their animals, making money by sorting deadly hepatitis-threatening medical waste.

As we sat and had tea with them (the son went to the school) the couple were moved by the idea that the children were picking through bloody bandages and syringes for a living and had no easy way to wash; certainly without hot water they could not sterilize things or get clean, and the hassle of carrying water buckets from the public tap 100 meters away discouraged thorough washing. So this couple, and two students, Andrew Besada a young Canadian/Egyptian student in Dr. Moshira Hassan’s environmental science class, visiting for the holidays, and Eric Kingman, a graduate student from the U.S. working on his Master’s in water management, generously donated enough money for us to build a bathroom with them, including sink, shower and toilet. Now their shanty has hot and cold running water supplied by our solar hot water system on the school.

I'm sure many readers have heard a million stories like this, so it is nothing new, but for us, on the ground for the past five years in the ghettos of Cairo, experiencing the power of global giving removed from the usual institutional aid model and made very personal, it was a revelation. We started thinking that the best way we could work with our friends to surmount the challenges they face was to create a kind of urban slum eco-tourism, bringing people on-site to see the problems, meet the people as individuals and brainstorm solutions.

We hadn't yet explored the idea of connecting with business school students working on social entrepreneurship worldwide and hadn't thought of building virtual relationships through excellent sites like GlobalGiving.com, using the magic of the internet and the powerful potential of multi-media telecommunications software and hardware to dissolve barriers between people formerly isolated by geography, language and perceptions of class. But speaking as a virtual visitor in the Berekeley business school class has opened that dimension to us now, and I hope we can do a whole lot more!

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Ph.D.'s and Ph.-do's

(T.H. Culhane, living at the L.A. Eco-Village in the early days of his UCLA Urban Planning Ph.D., circa 2002, innovating an experimental roof-top solar powered water recycling system out of off-the-shelf parts purchased at hardware stores and aquarium shops for possible third world applications. Description of the whole system below.)

(All Photos of L.A. Ecovillage courtesy of our friend and colleague Marlene Elias, who is writing up her Ph.D. dissertation on African Shea Butter cooperatives )

"The green economy needs Ph.D.'s and Ph.-do's" says Yale Law School Graduate Van Jones, now president of Green for All and executive director of the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights in Oakland that trains low-income workers for new "Green Collar Jobs" like how to weatherize homes and install solar panels.

Quoted in a special section of the New York Times on March 26th, 2008, called "Business of Green", Jones says, "We need people who are highly educated at the theoretic level, and we need people who are highly educated at the level of skilled labor".

As the co-founder with my German wife and Egyptian colleagues of the German-registered Association/Society ("Verein") "Solar CITIES", a green collar job training program that works principally in the slums of Cairo, I couldn't agree more.

But though the New York Times , in the same section, lauds new degree programs at Universities for "Majoring in Renewable Energy", such programs certainly did not exist when I started my Ph.D. in Urban Planning at UCLA in the fall of 2000.

In fact, not only was there no way to get educated at the level of skilled labor, there were no classes at the theoretical level either. Certainly not for people who want to help fight climate change by working with the urban poor on local household level solutions to their water, waste and energy problems. That is why, in order to prepare myself to be both one of those "Ph.D.'s AND Ph.-do's" that the New York Times says we need more of, I had to create my own hand-made program by combining my traditional theoretical studies at UCLA with practical hands on experiments at the Los Angeles Eco-Village, where I moved while trying to figure out how to apply the insights on political ecology I gained from my classes.

The skill development part, which has served me so very well in developing countries, like rural Guatemala (where I started my research) and urban Egypt (where I am completing it), of course took a tremendous investment of time and money, and explains why I am just now completing my dissertation after 8 long years.

8 years to do a Ph.D.?? Perhaps that seems long, but you have to figure that if the standard Ph.D. takes 4 years, the Ph.-do part takes just as long, and so doubles the timeline.

And that is important for others considering a similar path, and for those who design and administer academic programs in this era when we all need to be focussing our best minds on waging a war against climate change, poverty and environmental degradation -- the kind of gentle but disciplined war that provides the real solutions to the intransigent problems that create the conditions for terrorism.

One of the quotes from the literature that haunted me going into this was from "Involving the Community: A Guide to Participatory Development Communication" by Guy Bessette (published by the IDRC in 2004, ISBN 983-9054-41-4) . Bessette says,

"Often researchers and practitioners will adopt a vertical approach: they will identify a problem in a given community and experiment solutions with the collaboration of local people. On the communication side, the trend is to inform people of the many dimensions of that problem and of the solution they should implement and to mobilize them into action. But this way of working has little impact. After the completion of the research or the development project, things tend to return to normal."

That was what haunted me the most, and made it impossible for me to simply get my data and get out and write the dissertation.

The solution to this problem, the IDRC suggests, is to "change your attitude as a researcher and perceive the communities not as beneficiaries but as stakeholders". But in doing so, you become a stakeholder yourself, and the stakes just get higher and higher, as you build deeper and deeper relationships. Pretty soon you realize that you can't simply treat your new friends and colleagues as "research subjects" and that the "data" you are collecting and the conclusions you draw can radically affect their lives. You realize you have responsibilities to more than just yourself and your university.

"You must also be ready to develop partnerships and synergy with other development actors working in the same commuities..." says the theory handbook, "... one must learn to listen to people, to help them express their views and to assist in building consensus for action. For many researchers and development practitioners, this is a new role for which they may not have been prepared. It is a new way of doing research and development." (p.10)

But as the IDRC says in a companion volume called "Health: An Ecosystem Approach", one must "define a vision and common language that subsequently facilitates a conversion of research results into applicable, sustainable action programs. ANYONE SEEKING A QUICK FIX TO SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS ABSTAIN: the substantial preliminary planning required for an Ecohealth project will test your patience."!

And it will tax your time and your funds. Be prepared to devote your student loans and all your personal money to finding creative ways to help families in need while you "use them" or "mine them" for your data. People in "the third world" are very savvy, and they know that you can walk out of their community with data for a dissertation that will give you even more access to credit and job opportunities, social networks and capital that they can only dream of. So you have to be prepared to give more than a little something back!

To go about training to be a Ph.D. and a Ph.-do, merging theory and practice into successful PRAXIS, as UCLA fortunately encouraged me to do, not only takes a lot longer than the time usually alloted to a conventional Ph.D. but in my case, had to be done at the expense of my college loans, since funding has not been existent for "majoring in renewable energy praxis for third world applications", at least not in my department. And grants you get for on the ground work, like the one we got from US AID, MAY NOT BE SPENT ON YOU. Not one penny. You cannot take consulting fees, can't use a penny for transportation or even to buy materials for your own crazy experiments. You can't even buy a bowl of kushary. All the money you get for your idealistic projects must go to the community itself, and you will have to support yourself through your loans or fellowships or freelance jobs, in the meanwhile. So get used to it. And as there are very few, if any, programs that can teach you what you need to know (I would claim there are actually none) , you are going to have to hunt and gather and scavenge solutions to each problem you will encounter, because there is no "one size fits all" or "textbook" solution to development problems.

But the effort is worth it if you stick with it! After years of trial and error, after plunging myself (and my wife) into almost $100,000 in debt, trying to apply what we've learned from the literature and make it match with what we see on the ground, and trying desperately to create a program that will not fall apart once we leave, we have come up with a successful model. And once the Ph.D. is finally finished, and we devote ourselves to being 100% Ph.Dos, we now know, deep in the core of our being, that we CAN make a difference. So, as a couple that has "been there and done that" and is happy with the results, we are equally happy to encourage others to go down the Ph.D/Ph.Do path!

But along the way, we must caution others who have read the New York Times Green Business section and want to follow in ours and other's difficult footsteps of trying to simultaneously earn a Ph.D and a Ph.Do, here is a definite Ph.Don't:

Don't expect alot of support, not for years (unless you are very lucky) and don't expect it to be easy just because, as Thomas Friedmann reminds us "Green is now the new Red White and Blue". Green may be trendy, but economics and politics still rule both academia and field work. Development is so fraught with failure that very few departments or institutions can be expected to take the risk with you, and inertia will always be there to drag you back to that mainstream temptation to "get in there, get your data, and get out quick". Resist the temptation, but know that there will be MANY tough days ahead.

The consolation? When you get done, you won't just have a bound volume gathering dust on some university library shelf. You will have created something practical in the real world that really helped people.

And when it gets tought, remember the story, now told in this variant in Arabic by teacher's in the slums of Egypt ( like Hanna Fathy's brother Romani) about the little girl on the oil contaminated beach carefully cleaning the feathers of one of thousands of birds trapped in the oil-spill:

A skeptical man approaches and says "Don't you see how useless what you are doing is? There are thousands and thousands of dying birds here. What difference can you possibly make?"

To which the innocent girl replies "it may not make a lot of difference to you mister, but to this one bird it makes a hell of a lot of difference!"

When you earn a Ph.-do in renewable energy end environmental improvement, you will be in the same meaningful position, and through the love of each family you help, you will know the difference you've made in both their and YOUR lives.


First field experiments prior to departing for Guatemala and Egypt, 2002: Creating a solar powered water recycling/purification/heating system for household use.

Step 1: Just before taking a solar heated shower in my apartment on the first floor of the two-story apartment building at the L.A. Eco-Village, I would switch on a 12 Volt DC ShurFlo water pump that used 3 -7 amps of power (roughly the output of the blue 75 watt Astropower solar module on the left side of the futon-stand). This switch could also be activated by simply turning on and off the shower to save a step.



Step 2: The grey water from the shower was pumped up to the roof (via an ordinary garden hose; at this time cheap polypropylene pipe wasn't available) and into an elevated plastic container filled with alternating layers of sand and gravel. The very top layer had soil and was planted with hardy salt-tolerant grasses and weeds from the L.A. coastal area. This soil and sand filter was intended to trap particulate matter, hair and soap suds while growing a "shmutzedeck" , a slow sand filtration technique which many European cities choose as a water treatment method because of its simplicity, reliability, and economy (see Collins, Robin M., T. Taylor Eighmy, James M. Fenstermacher Jr., and Stergios K. Spanos. "Removing Natural Organic Matter by Conventional Slow Sand Filtration." Journal of the American Water Works Association 84.5 (1992): 80-90.)

Step 3: The effluent from the slow-sand filtration and shmutzedecke chamber was then gravity-fed into a second plastic container directly underneath the first that contained oxygenating aquarium plants such as Elodea. This second tank was connected to a third similar container by a piece of aquarium hobbyist equipment called a Venturi driven protein skimmer.

The protein skimmer transferred the water from the second container to the third container after injecting fine air bubbles and creating a vortex of foam froth and water in the bottom of the chamber, greatly increasing the amount of contact time and waste collected. The foam froth (mostly from soap suds) would enter the spill over cup on top of the protein skimmer and be passively piped (small plastic tube) to a collection bucket on the left of container (not visible above). This helped remove much of the soap that was not captured by the plants in the shmutzedecke slow-sand container (elevated tank 1) and by the aquarium plants in the second container.


The resulting grey water, still containing some sodium, sulfates and other salts (which I never figured out how to completely remove) would then circulate all day through two biological filters, one attached to each container. In the third tank a side mounted canister filter containing different biologically active filtration media would circulate the water and pump it back to the second tank via a side mounted supplemental fluidized bed filter connected in series.

(The fluidized bed filter in action! By "fluidizing" or suspending fine grained media in a column of water, the Aquarium Guys say, these devices " increase surface area and contact time for highly efficient biological filtration" )





Step 4: The water volumes in the third container and the second container are connected and the water thus circulates all day through the series connected biological filters (the blue rectangular box to the right of the container is the canister filter which pumps its water back to the second tank through the fluidized bed filter hanging on its side) Thus the action goes on all day. The water that enters the second container after being processed through the filters then recirculates into the third tank via the protein skimmer and this happens over and over until the water is clean enough to re-use in the shower.


Step 5: (photo not available) After a day of cycling through the biological canister filter on tank 3, the fluidized bed filter in tank 2 and the protein skimmer connecting them, the resulting water would be clean enough to then be pumped through a small chamber with an aquarium ozonizer and/or an aquarium UV Sterilizer on its way to the solar hot water tank to be heated for the shower. I experimented with both types of sterilizers: The UV sterilizer needs an expensive (~ $ 50) bulb change every 6-8 months, so was ruled out for third world applications. The ozonizer works on a spark principle (producing ozone -- that fresh rain smell - the same way a spark of lightning does) and so works well in arid environments; we read, but did not experience, that if the air is not dry it will not spark. Fortunately some manufactures also produce models for "humid" environments, so this should not be too much of a problem for our application.


Step 6: The resulting sterile water (though never completely salt free in my experience) was then connected to my solar hot water tank (basically a replumbed recycled 40 gallon originally gas heated water tank) . When I would take a shower, the vacuum created by the water falling to supply my shower would siphon more water into the tank. Water was heated actively, by circ pumping the water from bottom of the tank through a standard cartridge filter and into the copper coils in the absorber box, using a circulation pump ( a less expensive low flow Surflow 12 V pump ideal for circulation only) and back up to the tank.

(A good Friend and fellow Ph.D./Ph.-do, our French-Canadian-Egyptian colleague Marlene Elias, who studies Shea Butter cooperatives in Sierra Leone, was kind enough to visit us at the L.A. Eco-Village and take all these pictures of the system in action. To her left is an old radiator room heater painted black that we also found could be used in the solar heater box. After all these years we would have forgotten all the experiments we ran before heading to Egypt if it hadn't been for our colleague hunting through boxes of old pictures and scanning these and sending them to us. Thanks Marlene!)

My very first solar heater was built upon the advice of a Native American I met on Thanksgiving from an Indian Reservation near Palm Springs, who recommended simply taking a standard copper coil, throwing it in a box with a sheet of metal on the back, painting it black and covering with plexiglass. While not ideal, it eliminated the need to do much brazing (I only brazed the inlet and outlet pipes) and thus reduced the chance for leaks when built by a novice with no welding experience (in fact no brazing at all was really necessary, as one can use a flanging tool to connect the threaded end pieces!) .

The system did suffer two downsides: First, with a copper coil thermosiphoning did not occur (hot water does not "want" to fall down the loops -- we must think of hot water as being like a bubble, always wanting to rise and getting stuck in the top parts of each coil) and so I needed to pump the water. Second, the looping coil made it difficult to get good contact with the metal absorber plate, meaning we lost most conductive heating from the box's surface area.

Plexiglass seemed okay, and had the advantage of being unbreakable, though I was told it would cloud up over time.

The entire water filtration system was solar powered and consumed about 150 watts, easily supplied by the three 75 Watt panels on the futon frame (two Seimens 75s and one Astropower 75) . While the fluidized bed filter remained on all day, the other parts of the system only turned on when I took a shower so they consumed very little energy, leaving the panels to be used for recharging the batteries that powered my apartment the rest of the day. For the solar hot water heater circulation pump I used the small BP 30 shown in the picture (a portable solar panel made by British Petroleum) connected directly to the circulation pump. This 30 Watt panel was ideal as a driver for the circulation pump because it would start the water circulating through the solar hot water absorber when the sun was up and shut off when the sun went down, ensuring no heat loss. So in effect it acted as a passive thermosiphon system would, never requiring my attention.


The idea behind this whole experiment was to discover a way to recycle shower and bath water as many times as possible before having to supplement with a new water source. The target application was urban areas in developing countries that suffer severe drought stress, such as we get in Cairo. Los Angeles was the perfect proving ground.

From this experience we learned a few lessons.

1st was that while it is indeed easier to build a solar hot water collector out of a single coil of copper, as my Native American Indian friend suggested, the cost of PV and water pumps in Egypt, and the availability of qualified welders on every street in our target area makes it more economical to weld copper grids and create standard thermosiphoning systems. The lack of copper coil conductivity because of low contact with the metal plate makes the systems less than ideal for wintertime heating, when people need hot water most.

2nd, the water filtration system worked, but the initial sand-gravel-shmutzedecke container clogs up with organic shmutze after about two weeks and needs to be somehow backflushed to restore flow to the second container. I did not build this capability in and don't yet know how to make cleaning and maintaining this container simple and efficient. For now this is one of the two show-stoppers in the system, because nobody wants to climb up on the roof and clean out the sand and gravel filter twice a month.

3rd, The second show-stopper was the incomplete removal of sulfates from the grey water. Though the water was sterile, and probably didn't need the ozone filter to make it so (the solar hot water heater itself would clean the water due to the heat being over 60 degrees C in the pipes and the anti-bacterial action of copper, which both incapacitate Legionnaires' disease and other pathogens), it didn't "feel" completely "clean" after a week or so, and reminded the author of experiences taking showers in locations that have brackish or salty water. The soap just doesn't seem to sud right!

Nonetheless, with more trial and error this system has to work. After all, as one aquarium shop owner told me pointing to a beatiful large but delicate octopus he had in a tank "we are able to keep that lovely creature alive, sitting in the same water recycled over and over." Certainly recycling bath water, one of the largest water uses in a household, (particularly when one uses a dry composting toilet, as we did), can't be any more difficult. And purifying enough water for drinking (about 5% of household water use) has already proven feasible using a household solar distiller.

These issues we confronted, of course, must be resolved before these systems can be implemented in our development projects, but we made an ambitious start that does, on the surface, seem rather promising. I proved at least that a single person on a limited budget (student loans!) could make bold steps toward solving the water security issue that plagues so much of the world using locally available, off the shelf items and without adding to the carbon load of our atmosphere.

In the future, pending funding, Solar CITIES will follow the same model we followed with our successful solar hot water systems -- we will purchase and install two professional water recycling systems from RSD technologies (our local Egyptian vendor) for training and confidence building, then we will endeavor to create functionally similar systems from local and recycled materials completely using indigenous labor.

For domestic water recycling the professional systems we intend to purchase are "Solar Cubes" such as the one pictured below:

It is our experience as Ph.-dos that once a community's craftspeople get experience with a proven renewable energy or water/waste management technology, and are given the funding and the materials to cover opportunity costs and experiment with in a risk-free setting, their innate creativity and enthusiasm is let loose and they innovate sustainable solutions to their specific local challenges.

This is the mission of Solar CITIES!

Sunday, May 4, 2008

More trouble in Paradise? Fulfilling "the letter of the law" in the implementation of a USAID Small Development Activities Grant in Cairo, Egypt

No, this boy is not in jail! On the contrary, he is being liberated through "green collar" job training!

This enterprising young student at the Spirit of Youth NGOs "Zabaleen Recycling School" in the trash sorter community of Cairo is assembling a traditional flat-plate solar hot water system as part of a U.S. AID funded project that hopes to eventually create "a million solar roofs" and millions of green collar jobs in the poorest sections of his city ( at least 30 of them are being created this year for starters!) He is holding a locally welded grid of copper pipes that will be placed in the aluminum box behind him as the first step in creating a solar absorber.


But there is confusion in funding agencies about just what such an ambitious capacity-building project really entails, and how flexible and innovative to be when adapting to the rapidly rising prices of copper, aluminum and other materials, to the rapid changes in renewable energy technologies world-wide, and to the locals more-than-reasonable demand that stake-holders receive up-to-date training that will prepare them for climate-change/carbon-offset funds and green industries and not leave them behind. When a grant written two years ago finally gets funding after a long bureaucratic wait, and adaptation to current circumstances necessitates changes, should more bureaucracy and more delays be needed to review the way local NGOs spend their funds?

This blog entry explores how the Spirit of Youth has tried to deal with their mandate to build capacity for green collar jobs in solar heating amidst challenges from all sides...


Hanna and Moussa on the roof of the Samaan cafeteria after assembling and installing a modern vacuum tube solar hot water system.





(Local solar engineer Alaa Watidy, president of RSD technologies, donates his time to training local plumbers and craftspeople how to build the latest kind of German-designed/Chinese manufactured solar technology, purchased from his company for $1000 from our US AID grant using the budgeted "Tools, Workshop, Expert and Instruction funds". We learned that instead of paying such experts to come in and do training, as budgeted, it was more cost effective and more of a win-win if we bought the tools that could benefit the community from the experts and then had them come in to do free training. Thus we both "give a man a fish" AND "teach a man to fish" at the same time! After all, teaching a man to fish but not providing him with a fishing pole is a pretty bad way to go about education!)


Can we ever successfully implement our plans to provide safe, clean, economic solar-powered baths in the poor parts of Cairo, Egypt?





There are times in the life of all of us involved in the struggle to improve our collective environment, thinking we are working on behalf of all humanity, when we stand frustrated, discouraged, dumbfounded and even hurt, by what seems like entrenched and inexplicable resistance to all our best efforts to implement what we were absolutely sure we had been asked to do.

I know you've been there too, and sympathize!

Since 1973, when the University of California Press first published Pressman and Wildavsky's "Implementation: How Great Expectations are Dashed in Oakland; or Why it's Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All" we Urban Planning students have been treated to this book's tragic thesis as the bitter pill we have to swallow whenever we venture idealistically out into the world of on-the-ground advocacy for change. As Kenneth Walter famously said in his review in the Journal of Politics, "after finishing this book, readers wonder how any programs ever succeed!"

But like each fresh generation since the OPEC oil crisis of 1973 that started us all thinking about alternatives to fossil fuels, we somehow think "this time it will be different".

We think that Al Gore getting the Nobel Prize, and Leonard DiCaprio setting our clocks to "The 11th Hour" and NPR doing marvelous stories about Solar CITIES will somehow help us all turn the corner on climate change, environmental degradation, suffering and poverty.

How disappointing then, when you are in the midst of a successful implementation, and think you have overcome every local obstacle through stick-to-it-ivity, creativity and blood sweat and tears, when are charging forward, empowered by recent international attention, and suddenly find most of your time and energy must be spent fighting just to keep the project going because some people mysteriously start raising strange obstacles in the very path of implementation you thought they wanted to see.


I write this blog entry in the spirit of Pressman and Wildavsky's book, giving all the details of this particular so other scholars and students of planning and citizens of our lonely planet can "build morals on a foundation of [challenged] hopes" (to paraphrase the author's subtitle; I'm not saying our hopes are "ruined" in this case, unlike the famous Oakland situation, just saying we face obstacles!)

So what's the problem this time?

Another very discouraged and disillusioned email came in from Hanna Fathy this morning, yes, the morning of Weekend Edition, on the very day he should instead be celebrating his success in being broadcast to the world on National Public Radio instead.



(Hanna, in yellow, and Moussa, in green, demonstrate to the head chef of the St. Samaan cafeteria that he doesn't need to use the expensive electric water heater any more. They trained with local solar engineer Alaa Watidy of RSD technologies to assemble and install the 200 liter system on the roof of this public building so that entire community could learn how solar hot water works and benefit directly from it. Now they are being criticized for using $1000 of the $25,000 capacity building and implementation grant for not spending $350 less to build another home-made system. Their answer: "people need to experience and understand the new technologies so that they can innovate ways to improve the old ones. Otherwise people lose faith in the initiative, like they are being treated like they were and will always remain "backwards" or "behind the times.")

In it he states that not only has he and his Solar CITIES team been blocked from continuing their work in Darb El Ahmar (to learn more about that see our last post "The Disneyfication of Darb Al Ahmar and the Battle for the Rooftops of Old Cairo") but now some folks are questioning the way in which the team has gone about implementing the grant we wrote! I reproduce part of Hanna's email here, altering only the names he cites, for privacy issues:

'"Hi T.H.
Mr. X and Ms. Y and Ms. Z told me stop to working [in Darb Al Ahmar] , before the public
agree for the houses; just now Mr. V told me that Mrs W. said
that we haven't to buy any professional systems and we had to make the systems out of the
plastic bottles; she said that its not included in the proposal to buy professional
systems so we want to know if it's right and how can we answer her. Please answer now if
you can!
Hanna"

(One of the two controversy-provoking modern vacuum tube systems on the roof of the public cafeteria. It cost about $1000 from our grant budget instead of the roughly $650 we spend on materials to build hand-made flat plate solar hot water systems, and was intended to introduce the community to modern vacuum tube technology so they can train for jobs in the emerging solar industry and not be left behind. The systems still need an elevated cold water source (blue barrel) because of insufficient water pressure and sporadic availability in the area. The systems are imported from China, but assembled in Egypt. Until Solar CITIES purchased two of these systems, one for each community, they were only seen on villas and resorts. The poor complained, "why do we always have to get outdated technology? We can never progress if we don't experience the modern things." Flat-plate solar collectors, like the one's we build, have been in Egypt since Sadat had them installed in Government Buildings in the early 1970's)

For us, on this felicitous Sunday, it is enough to listen to a radio broadcast and feel pride and happiness over what we have achieved. For Hanna, as pleased as he is by the recognition, celebration over past accomplishments DOESN'T put food on the table, and doesn't help him save up for his marriage this summer. Every day he and his team our without work, every day that cash flow is delayed while the language of a grant proposal is debated and people muse over whether a given adaptation to changing circumstances was appropriate, is a day the poor, who took risks on these new "green collar jobs" go without the things they need to survive.

This is the critical difference between risk taking when you are from a fully developed economy and have credit sources and welfare safety nets, and risk taking when you are from a marginal community in an underdeveloped economy without any of those hedges to fall back on.

The Roh El Shabab Solar CITIES grant is at a critical phase, because the agreement was that they would get the first $12,500 dollars of the $25,000 budget to spend on the first six months of the project, and then, before they would be awarded the second half of the money, they would have to prove they had implemented the grant and created half the 30 systems we promised to build.

Lucky for us, we have.

15 systems are in place, despite the halt on construction in Darb Al Ahmar (the official excuse given is not an objection to the aesthetics, it is now said that we must "prove the solar technology works" due to concerns that "solar hot water systems could leak", as if plumbers haven't been dealing with leaks with every water system everywhere. I remember that solar installers in the U.S. faced similar criticisms, negative propaganda and bad press throughout the 1970s and 80s, so this is nothing new!) But we now have 15 systems that work and do NOT leak.

But that doesn't necessarily mean we will get the rest of the money to continue.

Why?

According to Hanna's email, somebody is now objecting that we used $2000 of the grant to purchase and install two professional vacuum tube hot water systems, one in each of the communities (at a cost of $1000 each) so that the team could train on up-to-date systems and so the community could see that solar hot water systems DO in fact work! The other objection, as far as it has been related to Hanna, is that somebody is suggesting we should also be spending the grant money building systems out of plastic bottles and is criticizing that we are building them out of glass, copper and aluminum.

To help Hanna, who naturally lacks the English skills and the long-term experience in hermeneutics necessary to interpret, when confronted by nay-sayers, whether the grant implementation is proceeding according to the "letter of the law", and to help help him and his team quickly, I am reproducing the original grant application in its entirety, making it available for everyone who is interested to read and interpret and providing my arguments and defense for why they are doing EXACTLY the right thing in adapting to circumstances and spending the money the way they are, purchasing and installing two locally supplied professional hot water systems on publicly visible and/or accessible buildings in both communities, and building conventional flat plate collectors for all the private dwellings.

Let the court of public opinion judge if we are implementing this grant in the right way.

In our original grant proposal it stated:

"... existing systems will serve as "growth poles" around which interest, confidence and expertise can be developed. The systems should be built in roughly concentric rings around the sites of original installations, until the communities in C3ITIES are connected by visible solar hot water roofs."

The materials were stated to be: "copper pipes, aluminum, glass, stainless steel, tanks, insulation, silicone, glue, pvc pipe, fittings, valves, temperature gauges, flow meters, argon, gas and arc welding, etc. and per hour charges of local welders, plumbers etc." including "paying
welder/electrician/carpenter/plumber to supervise workshop participants"

In the pictures accompanying the grant proposal we showed the kind of systems we would build and have built; none were made from plastic water bottles. All the systems we built were modeled after the types professional systems that were manufactured and available in Cairo at the time we made the proposal, and my wife and I personally purchased and donated the first professional flat plate training system. Of course the technology has advanced tremendously in the past two years since Al Gore has led the global campaign to fight global warming, and we are trying to stay abreast of these changes so that Egypt doesn't fall behind. So we now train on both flat plate and vacuum tube systems.

While it is true that the water storage barrels we use are indeed recycled plastic barrels, ( a clever local innovation the communities came up with to save money), originally, when we prepared the grant, we were using stainless steel tanks. By the time the grant came
through the cost of copper and steel had doubled, and we had to innovate ways of saving materials and money to fulfill our mandate of building 30 systems, but the original grant said nothing about making systems out of plastic bottles.

(Walid and Adham, two young teachers at the Recycling School, purchased recycled shampoo barrels in Manshiyat Nasser to use as cold and hot water storage tanks for the solar hot water systems they build...)
(... and carry them for miles through the streets because hiring a pick-up truck is too expensive given the limited funds available for the project)

At my own expense, and that of Dr. Moshira Hassan at AUC, we DID succeed in inventing systems that used recycled plastic water bottles instead of copper. Until now however, we have not solved the endurance problem with these systems (they are prone to leaks over time, and we need to find a better sealant) and so we never put one penny of US AID money into those experiments.

(Milad and Mikhail, who are children at the Zabaleen Informal Recycling School created by Dr. Laila Iskander, developed a solar hot water system made out of plastic pipes, recycled plastic water bottles and the shiny insides of potato chips bags, based on their observations of the professional vacuum tube systems we purchased. Such innovative experiments, ironically, were not funded by the U.S. AID development grant)


To fulfill our grant proposal "Section 20. Demonstration of required technical inputs or expertise to complete project" we had to make very sure we weren't compromising community confidence by putting systems on roofs that might turn people away from clean energy technologies.

Without involving Egyptian experts, like Engineer Watidy and the AUC professors, and having a well-made professional systems available for demonstration and to work with, the communities would feel we were trying to sell them on inadequate materials. This has been a problem E.F. Schumacher and others have described in the "Appropriate Technology" field for years. As you know, just because people are poor doesn't mean they want to deal with faulty or outdated technologies that will end up costing them more or creating more problems for their already overburdened lives!

(Alaa Watidy teaches how to assemble a modern vacuum tube solar hot water system on the roof of building 72 near the Ayubbid Wall)
(The professional system is placed near the wall so that both the community members and visitors to the park can experience the latest technology. This practice is now controversial, as some people think solar hot water systems are "ugly" and spoil the view of the ancient poor community called "historic" or "medieval" Cairo when looked at from a stroll in the garden. To avoid admitting the "aesthetic argument" claims were made that our hand-made solar systems might be "unreliable" or "might leak" as a justification for halting the project. The installation of the type of the same professional system that works just fine on rich people's villas, was done in this specific location partially to counteract that "technological" argument that is being used against providing solar hot water to the poor.


Community acceptance is a big part of the sustainability of this project, as you know, and one of the barriers to implementation that can be exploited by those who are not enthusiastic about renewable energy is the fear people have that the systems will leak, spilling water on their roofs (as if rain didn't do the same thing!) . For that reason, since the project is about building local capacity to build renewable energy systems, we have stuck to building traditional flat plate systems that are proven, and train with well made reliable systems (like the vacuum tube system shown above and below) for comparison.



To get community approval to make the project move forward, we had to convince both communities that solar hot water systems were viable and connected to a larger global initiative. Because training solar "green collar " workers is a complex process, we have to break it into two phases -- 1) the building of the solar hot water systems 2) the
building of cold water storage and adequate pressure feed tanks (since water is often unavailable in the community) and the installation and connection with household plumbing.

Both are complex processes.

In order to do the second part of the training, creating a class of plumbers/crafstpeople who could effectively work with solar hot water systems, and in order to make the first part of the training effective, and get community acceptance, we took approximately 10,000 LE from the
budgeted 43,000 LE for "Tools, machinery and workshop space" and "Instruction/Expert/Supervision Time (22,500 each -- see the budget) and used that money to purchase two "professional" solar hot water systems, one for each community, for training and installation.

We purchased the workshop systems from local vendor Alaa Watidy (RSD technologies, Heliopolis) and he and his staff of experts and DONATED THEIR TIME (as I have done all along!) to teaching the local community how to put together, build and install these modern solar hot water systems. We used these systems as WORKSHOP SYSTEMS for instruction
and training, and consider them vital tools. Thus they should be considered fully within our budgetary specifications and should not be a source of conflict.

Only with these two systems for training and display (one on St. Samaan cafeteria roof and the other next to the Ayubbid wall) could we meet our mandate of having "existing systems" that could serve as "growth poles around which interest, confidence and expertise can be
developed." Without these systems, no interest, confidence or expertise can occur, as one cannot train people to build their own systems by copying other hand-made systems - it is like making a bad photocopy of a photocopy.

We feel the local community has to see working, professionally made systems that inspire confidence in the technology or they learn bad technique and fear it is the technology itself that
is bad instead of , perhaps, faulty design of the local system.

By having one fully functioning system in each community that can be admired, and by having the ongoing donated expert supervision and instruction of Engineer Watidy and his staff from RSD technologies, we felt we had insured the sustainability of the project.

Hanna and Mahmoud and the others are feeling discouraged that every step
they take to continue making this great project a success despite
tremendous odds is being threatened by people with much more power
than them. And they sincerely want this to work!

To make things clear and to see how these decisions conform to our original grant proposal, we reproduce section 3:

"SECTION THREE: INFORMATION ABOUT THE BUDGET

12. The total budget:

To be effective in our community, vocational training must start with "on the job training"; people simply cannot afford the time or opportunity costs that come from completely giving up work to participate in educational activities without a realizable outcome.
Thus, we have to pay expert welders, carpenters, machinists, electricians and plumbers to both do work on the systems and to supervise training, and, for the participants, some of the hours spent learning to build the solar hot water systems, during which participants actually build the technology and infrastructure under the supervision of local welders, plumbers, electricians and carpenters, should be considered wage labor costs for them. This model is well established in our community, for example, the Aga Khan foundation, pays its trainees and gives them tools and a certificate at the end of the training."

"We anticipate that building an additional 30 solar hot water systems will cost approximately 135,000 L.E., based on a conservative estimate from the first three completed systems (3,500 L.E. in materials, 1000 L.E. in labor, from start to finish, without including instruction or
installation costs). We think that in the future, with a trained workforce, better machine tools and volume discounts on materials we could build each additional system for a marginal cost of 2000 L.E. , with 1500 L.E. in materials and 500 L.E. in labor per unit and may be able to start a small competitive business, turning our communities into net producers of solar energy and other environmental service systems. "

Happily, the team is on target, having built the first 15 systems and brought them in within the initial cost estimates in the budget. With the second flush of money they will easily achieve our stated goal, once the AKTC approves the new locations. Then we can move on to the
future goal of the project, as stated in the grant proposal:

"Once the craftspeople of our communities know how to build and operate solar hot water systems they will be able to serve not only the rest of the community but the entire region. Our experience has shown us that solar hot water systems are cost effective and efficient, even when built using local tools and materials. A trained work force in renewable energy systems manufacture from neighborhoods already adept at recycling, building and repairing appliances, we believe, will help kick-start Egypt's industrial ecology based economy."

Our method of implementation, we therefore feel, is "fulfills the letter of the law" as stated in the original proposal, and, by adapting to circumstances and meeting the needs and demands of the communities at a time of rising energy and commodity prices, food riots, and deep mistrust of "appropriate technology" solutions that can seem like "shabby hand-me-downs" to people who want to participate actively in the global economy, brings us closer to helping make Cairo a true "Heliopolis" -- a "City of the Sun".

_________________________________________________________________


USAID Small Development Activities Cairo, Egypt
APPLICATION SUBMISSION:
Applications may be sent to the above addresses at any time of the year.


Section One: Information About the Association

1. Full name of the Organization Applying:
Spirit of Youth

Contact Person:

Mustafa Hussein (Darb Al Ahmar), Ezzat Naem (Manshiyat Nasser)

Mailing Address: 6 Zuqaq Bahariya, Harith Aslan, Darb Al-Ahmar

Physical Address, Town, District, Region where Project is located:

Al Azhar Park Gate, Darb El Ahmar, Cairo, Egypt

Telephone Numbers:
Work:
Mobile: Mustafa: 0107201983 Ezzat: 0125823686
Home: 5147350
Fax:
Email: Mustafa: Mostafa_planet@Yahoo.com
Ezzat: EzzatNaem@hotmail.com
2. Background, Membership, and objectives of Organization

Spirit of Youth Association for Environmental Services is a newly formed NGO (established June 2004) representing the dreams and aspirations of the youth of the Manshiyat Nasser area.

Objectives are
1) protecting the local environment from pollution through activities such as recycling solid waste materials
2) raising the health and reputation of the garbage collector community
3) improving education and social opportunities for the residents.

3. List the Organization's past and present projects and how they have aided in developing the community and district:

Projects to date have included 1) the “irregular education school” where children who cannot attend normal school can get the same skills while continuing to contribute to the family income, 2) awareness campaigns for source separation of waste materials and 3) training for brick makers in ‘Arab Abu Sa’id in Helwan.
4. Has your Organization received any financial aid from other Embassies or International donors? If yes, which Embassies or donors?

A past donation has been received from an Italian Aid agency and the Proctor and Gamble Shampoo Company.
SECTION TWO: INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROJECT

5. Description of the Project:

Solar C3ITIES (Connecting Cairo Communities Integrating Technology for Industrial Ecology Systems) is a project undertaken by the Manshiyat Nasser/Darb El Ahmar Communities to bring together craftsmen and craftswomen, artisans, carpenters, welders, electricians and plumbers to build and introduce grassroots sustainable development infrastructure and technology through a new kind of vocational training program.

The C3ITIES pilot program began in the spring of 2006 by training a small group of children and adults from both of our communities to work cooperatively to create 3 fully functional solar hot water systems built completely out of local materials – even recycled solid waste – using local labour and expertise. These three units now sit on top of 2 residences in Darb El Ahmar and the Zabaleen recycling school in Muqattam, Manshiyat Nasser. A fourth system is under construction on the roof of a multi-occupant apartment building in Jumhuriya street neighborhood where Gamal Khudra lives. Gamal is one of the welders who used to live in Manshiyat Nasser and is now a contributor of in-kind material, training and labour to the project.
6. Purpose of the Project:

The purpose of the project is to build local capacity and create a knowledge and resource base that can “help our communities to help ourselves” and improve our environment, infrastructure and services using sustainable, cost-effective, environmentally-friendly and energy efficient technologies and materials. Our goal is to use the ongoing local construction of renewable energy systems as the basis for teaching vital vocational skills such as carpentry, welding, plumbing, metalwork and bending, computer aided design (CAD), internet-based research and micro-economics. The finished renewable energy appliances (solar hot water systems initially) will serve as a flagship in our communities (Manshiyat Nasser/Darb El Ahmar) for inspiring the area to use its skills and improve upon them, creating a more livable environment in the old city and its surroundings.

7. Organization of the Project:

The NGO "Spirit of Youth" is a registered Egyptian Non-Governmental Organization. It is a local initiative founded in Manshiyat Nasser. The C3ITIES renewable energy vocational training project that Spirit of Youth embarked on in the spring of 2006 involves many young community leaders and skilled craftspeople, from the recycling experts among the Zabaleen to the manufacturing experts, welders, plumbers, electricians, carpenters and artisans of Manshiyat Nasser, Darb El Ahmar and Jumhuriya Street. Based at the “Irregular Edcuation School” in Muqattam and utilizing small workshops in Manshiyat Nasser and Darb Al Ahmar, it has used existing informal and formal networks that link the communities to widen its circle of opportunities and effectiveness. The Spirit of Youth C3ITIES project has advisors from the American University in Cairo, the German Technical Development Organization (GTZ), and the Egyptian Association for the Protection of the Environment. Spirit of Youth has chosen Mustafa Hussein, a 23 year old carpenter originally from Manshiyat Nasser, now living in Darb Al Ahmar, whose father owns a small workshop in Manshiyat Nasser, to run the program. Mustafa created C3ITIES with backing and assistance from professors, teachers and students from AUC's Science Department and Environmental Science Club, UCLA's Institute of the Environment, and the Zabaleen Recycling School. Working in tandem with teachers from the Irregular School, Mustafa has been the chief organizer, designer, instructor and builder of the existing solar hot water systems – the first in the area.

8. The duration and timeline of the proposal activities:

This project aspires to train small teams of residents from our communities in the vocational skills pertinent to the design, construction, maintenance and repair of environmentally friendly technologies and systems. In our first year we plan to increase the number of trained participants by building an additional 30 solar hot water systems. These systems will be placed on the rooftops of the participants homes. This will act as a positive incentive for program participation since up to 60 % of the families in our neighborhoods have no hot water service at all. By using vocational training to build actual infrastructure that satisfies a real community need we thus increase the relevance and usefulness of our project.

It is expected from experience that a local team can be trained and produce an average of 3 systems per month using the local facilities in which the first 3 systems were built. Each month a different team of 3 to 4 individuals whose homes lack hot water provision will be invited to work with us in the building of their own family system. Graduates of the training become trainers of trainers. Thus, including the introductory theory and design classes and the system evaluation and follow-up, C3ITIES will have trained over a hundred individuals and produced and installed at least 30 “solar roofs” within approximately 49 weeks, a little less than 1 year from the start. Training of new team members (capacity building) and construction would begin immediately upon receipt of the funding, which would principally go for locally sold construction materials and building and installation costs (the fees of welders, plumbers, carpenters, glass cutters). We would hope to begin in December of 2006 and finish by December of 2007.

9. Beneficiaries (who and what number):

Beneficiaries will be over 100 individuals and at least 30 families who currently have no hot water service. Recent surveys by the GTZ and the Aga Khan foundation reported that in both communities up to 3/4 of the residents currently have no hot water service. This is principally a burden on women, who must take care of bathing the children and washing the clothes. It is expected that subsidizing the construction and installation of solar hot water systems would lessen the burden on women and improve their ability to keep their homes clean and their families safe. It is also known that improved hygiene and appearance from more frequent washing improves job possibilities.

The lack of hot water also produces health risks since the neighborhoods have inadequate sewage and waste removal infrastructure and the streets are frequently sources of contamination. Water over 55 degrees has been shown to kill bacteria.

Beneficiaries will be picked on both a needs-based and willingness-to-contribute basis. Those with the greatest need who agree to make in-kind contributions (according to the 30/70 model already in place for home renovations in Darb Al Ahmar) will be selected for the first 30 systems. Labor costs and material donations will be compensated for by owning the system after it is built.

It is expected that after this enough local capacity will have been built, and interest and demand generated to justify further investments. Eventually we hope that the entire communities can benefit, so that everyone has efficient, reliable, inexpensive, safe and environmentally healthy hot water.

10. Location of the project:

Muqattam Hills, Manshiyat Nasser, in the area surrounding our first demonstration solar hot water system at the Zabaleen school; Darb Al Ahmar renovation zone, in the area surrounding our second demonstration solar hot water systems at multioccupant building 72 and the individual unit belonging to the family of Mustafa Hussein; Jumhuriya street neighborhood, in the area surrounding the multioccupant apartment building where Gamal Khudr, a welder on our team, is installing our 4th system and where some of the material (copper pipes, tools, insulation) are procured. The existing systems will serve as "growth poles" around which interest, confidence and expertise can be developed. The systems should be built in roughly concentric rings around the sites of original installations, until the communities in C3ITIES are connected by visible solar hot water roofs.

11. About the project area:

Manshiyat Nasser has been identified as a Type B informal settlement, Darb Al Ahmar has been identified as a Type C slum and Jumhuriya Street is an entrepreneurial enterprise zone where tools and construction materials are made and sold and where small workshops do light manufacturing and repair of refrigerators, water coolers, air conditioners, and electric and gas hot water systems. The residents of Manshiyat Nasser and Darb El Ahmar shop for materials and outsource work to Jumhuriya street and there is a considerable informal flow of materials, people and expertise between the three communities. Up to this point, however, there has been no project connecting our communities, and no way to formalize the connections. The Spirit of Youth C3ITIES project is the first to make use of the informal relations between our areas and focus them on a forward thinking agenda for improving the housing stock, services and infrastructure of our city.

SECTION THREE: INFORMATION ABOUT THE BUDGET

12. The total budget:

To be effective in our community, vocational training must start with “on the job training”; people simply cannot afford the time or opportunity costs that come from completely giving up work to participate in educational activities without a realizable outcome. Thus, we have to pay expert welders, carpenters, machinists, electricians and plumbers to both do work on the systems and to supervise training, and, for the participants, some of the hours spent learning to build the solar hot water systems, during which participants actually build the technology and infrastructure under the supervision of local welders, plumbers, electricians and carpenters, should be considered wage labor costs for them. This model is well established in our community, for example, the Aga Khan foundation, pays its trainees and gives them tools and a certificate at the end of the training.

We anticipate that building an additional 30 solar hot water systems will cost approximately 135,000 L.E., based on a conservative estimate from the first three completed systems (3,500 L.E. in materials, 1000 L.E. in labor, from start to finish, without including instruction or installation costs). We think that in the future, with a trained workforce, better machine tools and volume discounts on materials we could build each additional system for a marginal cost of 2000 L.E. , with 1500 L.E. in materials and 500 L.E. in labor per unit and may be able to start a small competitive business, turning our communities into net producers of solar energy and other environmental service systems.

Our budget assumes material and labor at the rate we experienced building individual systems. If we can get volume discounts we can build more than thirty systems and train more than 100 people.

13: The local contribution (amount and type of contribution):

In kind: As a prerequisite for joining the initiative, and receiving the completed solar hot water system, families are expected to donate labor, materials, workshop space, tools and assistance valued at approximately 30% of the system cost. The principal local contribution besides space and tools is expected to be the donated time, labor and expertise of the “trainer of trainers”. Each team member, after completing a system, becomes a “trainer of trainers, supervised by community vocational experts, insuring sustainability of the project after the initial funding is used up. The feeding of workers and provision of transportation and accounting services are also considered in-kind contributions. Thus we expect roughly 1500 L.E. worth of in kind contributions per system (750 LE value in workshop space and tool rental, 750 LE value in instructional time -- estimating 1 day drilling and welding copper pipes, 1 day building collector boxes, 2 days stand construction, 1 day constructing heat absorber fins, 1 day painting, 1 day installing glass, 1 day installing and insulating tank and 2 days plumbing – 10 days total at 75 LE value per instructional day), or 45,000 LE for the 30 systems.

Cash: Those who would prefer to give cash rather than offer their time or labor and assistance in order to get a completed system on their roof, are expected to contribute money, again, amounting to roughly 30% of the system cost. So far, Dr. Jeffrey Miller of AUC has put 10,000 L.E. into the construction of the first systems. We anticipate other amounts from our institutional partners if we receive the grant funding, to ensure that we can finish the project.

14: The amount requested:

We are requesting the maximum grant level, 142,500 L.E.

15. Breakdown of Proposed Budget:

PROPOSED BUDGET


Items Cost per unit Total cost SDA contribution Grantee contribution
30 Solar hot water system materials 3500* 105,000 102, 000 3000
30 Solar hot water system labor costs 1000* 30, 000 30,000 0
Tools, machinery and workshop space, transaction costs (purchasing time and transportation) (overhead)
750 (equivalent) 22,500 0 22,500
Instruction/Expert Supervision time **
(overhead) 750** (equivalent) 22,500 10,000 12,500
* Full cost breakdown available upon request (i.e. per unit costs of copper pipes, aluminum, glass, stainless steel, tanks, insulation, silicone, glue, pvc pipe, fittings, valves, temperature gauges, flow meters, argon, gas and arc welding, etc. and per hour charges of local welders, plumbers etc. )
** This figure includes paying welder/electrician/carpenter/plumber to supervise workshop participants


16. Sustainability:

We believe that our project will be self-sustaining because demand for solar hot water and other energy efficient and environmentally friendly technologies is growing at an accelerating rate. Once the craftspeople of our communities know how to build and operate solar hot water systems they will be able to serve not only the rest of the community but the entire region. Our experience has shown us that solar hot water systems are cost effective and efficient, even when built using local tools and materials. A trained work force in renewable energy systems manufacture from neighborhoods already adept at recycling, building and repairing appliances, we believe, will help kick-start Egypt's industrial ecology based economy.

SECTION FOUR: REQUIREMENTS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS:

17. Brief environmental review (if involving sanitation, solid waste, etc.)




Our communities not only suffer from a lack of hot water heaters, but most areas have inadequate water pressure, making it impossible to use gas heaters. Many of us suffer from insecure income streams, making high cost electric water heaters financially risky. Inadequate or poor wiring also make electric heaters dangerous. Furthermore, the community has a poor sewage and waste disposal infrastructure, which increases the need for bathing, yet we do not have reliable ways of providing hot water to our families. Solar hot water systems with their own thermosiphoning storage tanks can solve many of these problems.

18. Brief plans or drawings if construction is anticipated.






19. Obtaining required permits from local authorities.

Our work was presented at the 2006 San Diego Energy Conversion Conference sponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. In attendance was Dr. Essam Khalil, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Cairo, who told us that he would help with the proper permits and municipality connections.

20. Demonstration of required technical inputs or expertise to complete project.

Our first three systems, built by Darb Al-Ahmar carpenter Mustafa Hussein, Jumhuriya street copper welder Gamal Khudr, Zabaleen school instructors Adham Fawzy and Medhat Sharkawy, along with the school children, and local plumbers and welders from all three communities, under our supervision, demonstrate our capabilities (see photos of completed systems above).

As technical advisers, donating their time and expertise, we have UCLA Ph.D. Urban Planning student Taha Rassam Culhane, AUC Professor of Engineering Salah El Haggar, AUC Professor of Physics Salah Arafa, Wadi Environmental Science Center Instructor Hala Moheddin, former AUC Environmental Science professor Jeff Miller, AUC Master's Student in Industrial Ecology Lama El Hatow, Egyptian Society of Scientist's and Engineers director Alaa Watidy and San Diego based Solar Thermal Engineer Kurt Lund.

21. Demonstration of capability to operate and maintain the project (particularly if equipment will be financed. )

Spirit of Youth has embraced the C3ITIES initiative and will carry its benefits forward past the initial 30 solar roofs. Our initiative has been embraced by planner Seif El Rachidi of the Aga Khan restoration, who has given us permission to build our systems in the restoration area of Darb Al Ahmar, and by the GTZ, who have given us permission to build our systems in Manshiyat Nasser. Both have told us that they agree this is a much needed initiative for our communities, and will help to oversee its continued success and expansion.

________________________________________________________________

The original grant application form is reproduced here:

USAID Small Development Activities Cairo, Egypt

Overview
A special fund to assist communities with the development of small scale, local initiative projects is available through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) in Egypt. This fund, known as the Small Development Activities program, assists limited, grassroots and community run efforts in Egypt.

Goals
The goal of the Small Development Activities program is to improve the basic economic and social conditions of the community or village. Because the needs of each community vary widely, the assistance is based on the local circumstances. Previously approved projects include: infrastructure improvements, the establishment of carpentry workshops, computer and vocational training centers, as well as programs for goat raising.

Small Development Activities
PROJECT GUIDELINES
To qualify, a project must respond to a pressing community need and result in a lasting improvement to the community. The associations must start the project themselves and donate labor, material, or money. The associations must show that they can complete the project in less than one year and continue to maintain it in the years ahead.

There is no ideal Small Development Activities project. However, successful projects share similar features. Small Development Activities should:
  • Respond to community needs and plan to improve basic economic and social conditions of the local community;
  • Show local initiative and involvement
  • Benefit a substantial number of people in the community;
  • Involve women as participants and beneficiaries;
  • Involve a significant contribution of labor, money or materials by members of the local community;
  • Be within the means of the local community to operate, maintain and sustain; and
  • Be able to implement the activity within the one-year agreement period.

While it is not possible to list all restrictions, Small Development Activities funds may not be used for the following:
  • Start-up costs;
  • On-going administrative or operating costs, such as salaries and rent;
  • Purchasing vehicles and office equipment;
  • Religious activities;
  • Activities that receive USAID funds or have recently received a Self-Help grant.
FUNDING
The grant ranges between US $10,000 and US $25,000 (currently about LE 57,000 and LE 142,500 at a 5.7 exchange rate).

TYPES OF PROJECTS
  • Small-scale infrastructure projects
  • Improvement of the position of women
  • Improvement of the living condition of disadvantaged children
  • Vocational training
  • Benefiting the environment

HOW TO APPLY
If your organization has a project that falls within the guidelines of the Small Development Activities program and you wish to apply for a grant, complete the application form and send to:
Fax: 516-0678 or
Mail: Small Development Activities Program
The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)
P.O. Box 32, Maadi
Cairo, Egypt,
Postal Code: 11435

Further information can be obtained from the USAID by contacting the Small Development Activities Program assistant by phone 522-6754/6755/7000
Email: CairoSDA.PSD@usaid.gov/ asoliman@usaid.gov
or through the website: www.Egypt.USAID.gov .